Analysis of humoral immunity in broilers challenged with Eimeria prior to and following anticoccidial vaccination, by means of ELISA

Authors

1 Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran-Iran

2 Department of Animal and Poultry Health and Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran-Iran

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the use of prophylactic chemotherapy and vaccination, coccidiosis is still one of the most devastating diseases in poultry industry. Understanding the immune mechanism helps researchers to prevent this parasitic infection more effectively. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antibody response in chickens, induced by a live attenuated vaccine (Livacox Q), before and after challenge, by means of ELISA. METHODS: One hundred and twenty one-day-old male Ross 308 broiler chicks were randomly divided into 4 groups of 30 birds. In 4th day of age, half the birds were orally vaccinated. The challenged groups received the infective dose at 14th day of age via oral administration. Besides recording weight gain, lesion score and oocyst count in 21st day old birds, humoral immunity was assessed by means of ELISA on serum samples taken from 7 and 21day-old birds. Results: Three days post vaccination, the average of optical density (OD) showed significant difference between vaccinated (0.553) and unvaccinated (0.686) birds (p≤0.05). In 21 day-old birds, the OD of unvaccinated-unchallenged (negative control) groups (0.331) differed significantly with vaccinated-unchallenged (0.663) birds. The average of lesion score in vaccinated-challenged birds (2.22) showed significant dissimilarity with unvaccinated-challenged groups. No difference and correlation were observed in comparing average of weight gain and oocyst count with serum optical density among treatment and control groups. ConclusionS: The results indicated that ELISA can be used for evaluating immunity uniformity of a flock after vaccination. Besides inducing antibody responses comparable to challenge with wild oocysts, vaccination with live attenuated coccidiosis vaccines may have inhibitory effects in intestinal lesion scores which are responsible for pathogenesis and economic loss during coccidial infections.

Keywords


Chapman, H.D. (1989) Sensitivity of field isolates of Eimeria tenella to anticoccidial drugs in the chicken. Res Vet Sci. 47: 125-128.
Constantinoiu, C.C., Molloy, J.B., Jorgensen, W.K., Coleman, G.T. (2008) Antibody response against endogenous stages of an attenuated strain of Eimeria tenella. Vet Parasitol. 154: 193-204.
Conway, D.P., McKenzie, M.E. (2007) Poultry Coccidiosis Diagnosis and Testing Procedures, (3rd ed.) Blackwell Publishing, Iowa, USA. p. 41-49.
Conway, D.P., McKenzie, M.E., Dayton, A.D. (1990) Relationship of coccidial lesion scores and weight gain in infections of Eimeria acervulina, E. maxima and E. tenella in broilers. Avian Pathol. 19: 489-496.
Gilbert, E.R., Cox C.M., Williams, P.M., McElroy, A.P., Dalloul, R.A., Ray,W.K., Barri, A.,  Emmerson, D.A., Wong, E.A., Webb, Jr.K.E. (2011) Eimeria species and genetic background influence the serum protein profile of broilers with coccidiosis. PLoS ONE. 6: e14636. doi:10.1371/journal. pone. 0014636
Holdsworth, P.A., Conway, D.P., McKenzie, M.E., Dayton, A.D., Chapman, H.D., Mathis, G.F., Skinner, J.T., Mundt, H.C. and Williams, R.B. (2004) World association for advancement of veterinary parasitology (WAAVP) guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of anticoccidial drugs in chickens and turkeys. Vet Parasitol. 121: 189-212.
Hudson, H.P., Hay, F.C. (1989) Practical Immunology. (3rd ed.) Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, London, UK.
Lee, S.H., Lillehoj, H.S., Dalloul, R.A., Park, D. W., Hong, Y.H., Lin, J.J. (2007) Influence of Pediococcus-based probiotic on coccidiosis in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 86: 63-66.
Lee, S.H., Lillehoj, H.S., Park, D.W., Jang, S.I., Morales, A., García, D., Lucio, E., Larios, R., Victoria, G., Marrufo, D., Lillehoj, E.P. (2009) Induction of passive immunity in broiler chickens against Eimeriaacervulina by hyperimmune egg yolk immunoglobulin Y. Poult Sci. 88: 562-566.
Lee, S.H., Lillehoj, H.S., Park, D.W., Jang, S.I., Morales, A., Garcia, D., Lucio, E., LArios, R., Victoria, G., MArrufo, D., Lillehoj, E.P. (2009) Protective effect of hyperimmune egg yolk IgY antibodies against Eimeria tenella and Eimeriamaxima infections. Vet parasitol. 163: 123-126.
Lillehoj, H.S. (1989) Intestinal intraepithelial and splenic natural killer cell responses to eimerian infections in inbred chickens. Infect Immune. 57: 1879-1884.
Lillehoj, H.S. (1996) Immunity and host genetic based control strategies for avian coccidiosis. Poult Sci. 35: 294-301.
Rose, M.E. (1972) Immunity to coccidiosis: maternal transfer in Eimeria maxima infections. Parasitol. 65: 273-282.
Rose, M.E., Hesketh, P. (1982) Immunity to coccidia in chickens: adoptive transfer with peripheral blood lymphocytes and spleen cells. Parasite Immunol. 4: 171-185.
Rose, M.E. (1973) Immunity to Emeriabrunetti and Eimeria maxima infections in the fowl. Parasitology. 57: 363-370.
Smith, N.C., Wallach, M., Miller, C.M., Morgenstern, R., Braun, R., Eckert, J. (1994) Maternal transmission of immunity to Eimeria maxima: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis of protective antibodies induced by infection. Infect immune. 62: 1348-1357.
Smith, N.C., Wallach, M., Petracca, M., Braun, R., Eckert, J. (1994) Maternal transfer of antibodies induced by infection with Eimeria maxima partially protects chickens against challenge with Eimeria tenella. Parasitology. 109: 551-558.
Talebi, A., Mulcahy, G. (1995) Correlation between immune responses and oocyst production in chickens monospecifically infected with Eimeria maxima. Avian Pathol. 24: 485-495.
Wallach, M. (2010) Role of antibody in immunity and control of chicken coccidiosis. Trends parasitol. 26: 382-387.
Wallach, M., Smith, N.C., Miller, C., Eckert, J. (1994) Eimeria maxima: ELISA and western blot analysis of protective sera. Parasite Immunol. 16: 377-383.
Williams, R.B., Catchpole, J. (2000) A new protocol for a challenge test to assess the efficacy of live anticoccidial vaccines for chickens. Vaccine. 18: 1178-1185.